Steven Julaka
72 matches · 41W–31L · seasons 2024–2026
Captains: add Steven Julaka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history72 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Josh Rich / Jonathan Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams61 teams · 2021–2027
Hoover Met - Younghouse
LifeTime - Hutto/Stout
West Homewood - Julaka/Parris
BH - Finney/Porter
Finney
Highland Park - Wisener
Highland Park - Wisener/Glass
Hoover Met - Younghouse
Life Time - Stewart
Life Time - Strickland/Nelson
Mt. Brook YMCA - Wisener/Penick
West Homewood - Porter/Finney
West Homewood - Wisener
YMCA Mt. Brook - Frederick
YMCA Mt. Brook - Younghouse
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 47.1% of games
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.8% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.2% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
91.3%
21W–2L · 61.8% of games
4.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
12 matches
#1 Singles
15%
11 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.