← Search

Michael Lesko

— year-end
107 matches · 73W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Lesko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-06-30 · STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-16 · STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Raclin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · Lesko (S) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Michael Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-26 · Lesko (S) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Franklin Zhong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-3
L
2026-05-19 · Lesko (S) · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Michael Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · Lesko (S) · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-21 · Lesko (S) · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ray Ohara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-14 · Lesko (S) · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-06 · STL/Tchen/18&OverHigh-TriM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Franklin Zhong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-07-17 · Hamilton/Mosley · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ana Gomez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-09 · STL/Tchen/18&OverHigh-TriM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Tosie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-07-05 · Hamilton/Mosley · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ana Gomez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70%
7W–3L · 59.7% of games
4.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.7% of games
4.5
88.2%
30W–4L · 59.8% of games
5.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 42.9% of games
10.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
60%
15W–10L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova