Huan Chang
Chicago, IL
410 matches · 244W–166L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Huan Chang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history410 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-4, 1-0
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams138 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 1.Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 1.Tam Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E M18.7.0 6.LSF Chang Sun 7 $26
CHI E M18.9.0 4.LSF Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 1Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA E 55&OW8.0 1Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA E M18&O7.0 1Lake Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA E M18&O8.0 1Tam Wright Sat 7 $22
CDTA E M18&O9.0 2Lake Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA E M40&O8.0 4Nbrk Marberry Sat 3 $28
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 2.Tam Wright Fri 7 $22
CDTA S M18&O7.0 4.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA S M18&O8.0 1.Tam Wright Tue 7 $22
CDTA S M18&O9.0 3.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA S M40&O8.0 1.Nbk Marberry Tue 7 $28 $28
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 5.Tam Wright Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Sat 4 $22
CDTA W ComboX8.5 2.CPW Yang Sat 6 $28
CDTA W M18&O7.0 1.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA W M18&O8.0 3.Tam Wright Sat 7 $22
CDTA W M18&O9.0 2.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26
CDTA W M40&O8.0 4.Nrbk Marberry Sat 3 $28
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette Tennis-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA S 75WCg Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA S 85CWc Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-Podwika
NITA W 85CWa Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
80.3%
53W–13L · 65.7% of games
4.5
39.4%
13W–20L · 51.2% of games
7.5
75%
12W–4L · 64% of games
8.0
50%
11W–11L · 54.3% of games
8.5
66.7%
28W–14L · 57.2% of games
7.0mixed
68%
17W–8L · 58.4% of games
8.0mixed
67%
67W–33L · 56.5% of games
8.5mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 38% of games
9.0mixed
42.6%
29W–39L · 46.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
148 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
145 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
115 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.