← Search

Brian Johnson

Omaha, NE
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
24 matches · 4W–20L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Brian Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-06-29 · Thomas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Hlavac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-22 · Thomas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Hlavac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · Thomas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Hlavac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-11 · Thomas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Hlavac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Tammy Tegler / Craig Matulka
2018-02-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vannette Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
Atsuko Christensen / Lynn Lamprecht
2018-01-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Iona Pavlik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
Ted Plugge / Jennifer Allison
2018-01-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Iona Pavlik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
Ricardo Hernandez / Joseph Shea
2017-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Thomas Walker / Samuel Weitkemper
2017-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Roland Augspurger / Michael Willman
2017-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Myron Sikora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Ricardo Hernandez / Barry Dahlkoetter
2017-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Myron Sikora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
Thomas Walker / Jason Rodenberger
2017-05-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Mendenhall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.6% of games
4.0
17.6%
3W–14L · 40.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova