← Search

Kim Kobata

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
251 matches · 163W–88L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Kobata to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history251 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Summer Swingers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Addicott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · Summer Swingers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Addicott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · HBSQ-Vana · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Van Mieghem mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · Summer Swingers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Mckenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · HBSQ-Vana · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Max Genereaux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-12 · Summer Swingers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Mckenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Mckenny championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Mckenny championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Darla Schlumberger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Mckenny championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Mckenny championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Mckenny championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
67%
65W–32L · 55.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.6% of games
7.0
100%
14W–0L · 77.2% of games
8.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 60.7% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
28W–28L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
79 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert