← Search

Ed Schwartz

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 31W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ed Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-04-19 · IRV-Plowman/Walker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee Schwartz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-18 · IRV-Plowman/Walker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee Schwartz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-01-25 · N OR-IRV-Laurent · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Alan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-04-13 · IRV-Laurent/Martinez · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aluko Hope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-30 · IRV-Laurent/Martinez · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Bean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-03-21 · #3 Doubles · with Omar Martinez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-03-16 · IRV-Steinhoff/Laurent · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Streich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-03-15 · IRV-Steinhoff/Laurent · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Streich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-02-23 · IRV-Steinhoff/Laurent · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Laurent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-01-25 · IRV-Steinhoff/Laurent · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2024-11-10 · IRV-Harris · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-10-13 · IRV-Harris · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Streich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2008–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
53.8%
14W–12L · 55.3% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.4% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova