← Search

Danielle MacDougall

Palmetto Bay, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 22W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Danielle MacDougall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Cagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Cagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · Net Chix at Coral Reef · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Aleesa Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-22 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Maurno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-13 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Maurno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-30 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Maurno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-17 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-09 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-23 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Standiford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-01-20 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Voell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-03 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Voell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-09-29 · Picard (Coral Pine) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gae Shapiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
35.2%
19W–35L · 46.8% of games
5.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.1% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova