← Search

Dina Fisher

Chagrin Falls, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 150W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dina Fisher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history219 matches
W
Julie Pulk / Kristen Jones
2026-07-13 · A55 7.0W D CV2 Hofer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Weyenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · 55 7.0W E CV Prindle · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · A55 6.0W CV1 Fisher · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Lovejoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-20 · A18 3.0W CV2 Derbyshire · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holli Blazey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-18 · A55 7.0W D CV2 Hofer · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Weyenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · A55 6.0W CV1 Fisher · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mamie Manchester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-13 · A18 3.0W CV2 Derbyshire · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · X40 6.0 CV Poe · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brandon Johannes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-23 · A55 6.0W CV2 Fisher · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Paul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · A55 6.0W CV2 Fisher · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Kamensky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · X40 6.0 CV Poe · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carl Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · A18 3.0W CV Urbanowski · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ivana Urbanowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
73.8%
62W–22L · 57.4% of games
3.5
25%
5W–15L · 44.3% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
75.9%
22W–7L · 58.4% of games
6.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 51.3% of games
7.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 61.2% of games
6.0mixed
58.6%
17W–12L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 59.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
54 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert