← Search

Dorian Consiglio

Hauppauge, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 77W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dorian Consiglio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-08-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diann Starcke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diann Starcke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diann Starcke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Stickney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Cifelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-21 · Park Ave, Starcke · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-10 · Park Ave, Starcke · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Buckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-09-28 · Park Ave, Starcke · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Troy Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Troy Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-22 · Blue Point, Cifelli · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corinne Fallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heidi Cifelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Misha Monticciolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
47.6%
40W–44L · 48.3% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
17W–17L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.1% of games
8.0mixed
29.2%
7W–17L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert