← Search

Linda Albert

— year-end
139 matches · 91W–48L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Linda Albert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · with Megan Swartz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Linda Albert - (DQ)* / Keri Casper
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · with Lori Schock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-05 · SAZ 18/4.0 W- Hannah Jablonski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keri Casper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margery Teller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-09 · LA - Network Stars · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Alsina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · SAZ 18/4.0 W- Hannah Jablonski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
Linda Albert - (DQ) / Keri Casper
2026-04-10 · Isn't She Dovely · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-09 · SAZ 18/4.0 W- Hannah Jablonski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-22 · LA - Network Stars · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Branscome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · LA - Network Stars · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Alsina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-27 · Perfect Storm · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams26 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
66.7%
36W–18L · 56.5% of games
4.0
62.8%
27W–16L · 53.8% of games
7.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer