← Search

Michele Messmer

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 44W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michele Messmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
Christina Volpe / Nicole Smith
2026-09-04 · CAckels (PCC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly French
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · CAckels (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Claffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-20 · JMurphy (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Duggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-24 · JMurphy (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sumi Gerry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-09 · JMurphy (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cassandra Greco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-02 · JMurphy (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
Jennifer Hutson / Courtney Reichs Mixon
2025-10-08 · CAckels (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Heidkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-10-02 · CAckels (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Eades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-09-22 · CAckels (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Sofsian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-19 · CAckels (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Claffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-09-12 · CAckels (PCC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly French
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-27 · CAckels (PCC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Eades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.9% of games
3.5
31.6%
12W–26L · 44.7% of games
6.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer