← Search

Elizabeth Lueg

Saint Louis, MO
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
147 matches · 61W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Lueg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
W
2026-04-26 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Angus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-04-19 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Brinker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Hoxsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-08 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Brinker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-22 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hanna Schuermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-08 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Lorence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · Hoxsey 3.5W (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tori Cheatham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-01-04 · Hoxsey (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meaghan Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-12-14 · Hoxsey (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martille Elias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-11-23 · Hoxsey (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Sair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-11-09 · Hoxsey (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Brinker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-10-19 · Hoxsey (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerry Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70%
14W–6L · 57.8% of games
3.5
42%
47W–65L · 45.9% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–12L · 30.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
38 matches
#2 Singles
9%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe