← Search

Brett Bormann

Dallas, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 12W–4L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brett Bormann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
Jackson Moser / Katherine Smith
2026-07-12 · SMU/Lu X9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hannah Park mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Vincent Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · SMU/Lu X9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emily Lu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-20 · Bob DayTC/Frajkor-Maldonado M4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Krystyan Lazarin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Bob DayTC/Frajkor-Maldonado M4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Krystyan Lazarin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Bob DayTC/Frajkor-Maldonado M4.5 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · Bob DayTC/Frajkor-Maldonado M4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vincent Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · Bob DayTC/Frajkor-Maldonado M4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vincent Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-27 · Oak Creek/Chopra-Patel M4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samuel Hussein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-27 · SMU/Lu X9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emily Lu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-07-20 · SMU/Lu X9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stella Nguyen Bezabeh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-13 · SMU/Lu X9.0 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cecilia Hernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.8% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams