← Search

Johanna Steinberg

— year-end
56 matches · 31W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Johanna Steinberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-08-05 · CRRC Hot Shots 55+ 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Stickler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · CRRC Hot Shots 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-22 · CRRC Hot Shots 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · CRRC Hot Shots 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · CRRC Hot Shots 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · CRRC Early Birds 55+ 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · CRRC Hot Shots 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Stickler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-12 · CRRC Early Birds 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Dana Jensen / Grace Fung
2026-03-25 · CRRC Wildcats · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Aizen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-19 · CRRC: Wildcats · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-09-10 · CRRC: Wildcats · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-08-11 · #3 Doubles · with Jane Greene championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams11 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 64.8% of games
6.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.4% of games
7.0
25%
5W–15L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert