← Search

Lynette Sanford

Charlottesville, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 94W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lynette Sanford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Forest Lakes - Furlow · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Ruiz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · Forest Lakes - Furlow · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-19 · Forest Lakes - Furlow · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-06 · Forest Lakes - Furlow · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Gunnels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · Forest Lakes - Furlow · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shauna Hogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · Forest Lakes - Furlow · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maren Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Forest Lakes - Furlow · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terry Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · FL - Baker - Mid-Court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Benjamin Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · FL - Sanford · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · FL - Sanford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shauna Hogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-11 · FL - Baker - Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Hay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-07-08 · FL - Sanford · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
46.3%
50W–58L · 48.7% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 43.8% of games
5.5
75%
12W–4L · 61.9% of games
6.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 54.3% of games
6.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
29 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer