← Search

Catherine Matawaran

Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 19W–17L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Catherine Matawaran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-07-27 · WOCC Sampson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-26 · WOCC Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Asha Kays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · WOCC Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelli Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Kristen Powers / Erika Anderson
2026-07-23 · WOCC Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Asha Kays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · WOCC Sampson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacy Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-12 · WOCC Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Asha Kays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · WOCC Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Asha Kays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · 14 WOCC Purcell 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Scott Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-30 · 14 WOCC Purcell 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5
L
2026-06-28 · WOCC Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Hamlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · WOCC Sampson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacy Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-20 · WOCC Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Hamlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 50.7% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.2% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 23.8% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 53.3% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer