← Search

Nancy Lasher

— year-end
90 matches · 40W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Lasher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-08-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Whearty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Bethpage, Newman/Ruppert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Alice Ruppert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Carefree, Simon/Halsted · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Whearty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-6
W
2026-07-14 · Bethpage, Newman/Ruppert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Whearty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Bonanno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Dananberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · Bethpage, Newman/Ruppert · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-6
W
N/A
2026-06-18 · Carefree, Simon/Halsted · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Whearty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · Bethpage, Newman/Ruppert · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Whearty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Carefree, Simon/Halsted · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Whearty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · Bethpage, Newman/Ruppert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
37.8%
14W–23L · 47.9% of games
3.5
28.1%
9W–23L · 42.7% of games
6.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 60.2% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe