← Search

Elizabeth Hepp

Moorestown, NJ
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 28W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Hepp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-01-04 · SOUTH FALL 2025/Ball Busters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristine Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-16 · SOUTH FALL 2025/Ball Busters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joann Muhr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
Michele Seher / Lindsey Thul
2025-10-26 · SOUTH FALL 2025/Ball Busters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristine Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Jamie Canataro / Michelle Cuff
2025-10-19 · SOUTH FALL 2025/Ball Busters · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deepa Barot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2024-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Gatto-Rekant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcela Roger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Helen Stancil / Mark Hatoff
2024-02-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rob Byrnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2024-02-02 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robert Garcia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-11-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eileen German
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2023-10-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Mada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2023-07-23 · Vintage Hot Mess · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Mada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2023-06-25 · Vintage Hot Mess · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie DeJesus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
33.3%
19W–38L · 43.1% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 28.6% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.2% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe