← Search

Cathy Sirmans

Aiken, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 35W–29L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Cathy Sirmans to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-08-24 · RVW/Flanders · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Butcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · Newman - Percell · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sydney Quick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Konn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Newman - Percell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Klein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Riverview Flanders · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tammy Butcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Konn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-21 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Don Houck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · Riverview Flanders · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betsy Luquire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · Riverview Flanders · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tammy Butcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-27 · Newman - Percell · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-26 · Riverview Flanders · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tammy Butcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · Riverview Flanders · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Schweizer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
54.8%
23W–19L · 51.8% of games
6.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 50.8% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 39.5% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe