← Search

Pam Inman

— year-end
92 matches · 23W–69L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Pam Inman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Harrison TC (Janet Stewart)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-07 · Harrison TC (Janet Stewart)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha van Atta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · Harrison TC (Janet Stewart)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-26 · Harrison TC (Janet Stewart)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · Harrison TC (Janet Stewart)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-25 · Jefferson Township (Susan Rasmussen)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Vines-Clemans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-21 · Jefferson Township (Susan Rasmussen)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-13 · Jefferson Township (Alice Bell)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Coskrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-12-09 · Jefferson Township (Alice Bell)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-11-04 · Jefferson Township (Alice Bell)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-08 · Jefferson Township (Alice Bell)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-01 · Jefferson Township (Alice Bell)* · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams9 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 45.2% of games
3.5
20.3%
13W–51L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
15 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova