← Search

Natacha Phillips

— year-end
211 matches · 134W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Natacha Phillips to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history211 matches
W
2026-09-02 · WTC - Griger 7.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Griger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-30 · WTC - Phillips 18 & Over Womens Combo · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Odom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-05 · DO - Brown · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · DO - Brown · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5
L
Stephanie Steele / Molly McCrory
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Ashley Edmonds championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Ashley Edmonds championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-20 · DO - ABrown · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Davis Flowers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-06 · DO - ABrown · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Derek Cotton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · Phillips-Edgewater · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Honeycutt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-22 · Phillips-Edgewater · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Edmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · DO - Brown · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Edmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-12 · DO - Brown · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Edmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
67.9%
38W–18L · 57.2% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 68.4% of games
8.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.4% of games
4.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.8% of games
7.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
65.7%
23W–12L · 55.9% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
49 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova