← Search

Britta Zimmer-Long

Hilo, HI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 84W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Britta Zimmer-Long to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-09-06 · Kimi's Team 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miki Kaneao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Kimiona Watkins / Lori Loo
2026-09-05 · Kimi's Team 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miki Kaneao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Kimi's Team 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miki Kaneao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-24 · 8.0B · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jamie Irie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Loosely Strung · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lance Kaneshiro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · 8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jamie Irie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-27 · Loosely Strung · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Long mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · Loosely Strung · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Long mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Sweet Shots · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · Sweet Shots · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · Sip Happens · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liane Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · Sip Happens · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
86.4%
51W–8L · 64.6% of games
4.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 42.8% of games
7.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 60.2% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 33.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 47% of the time
#1 Singles
47%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#1 Female Doubles
11%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe