← Search

Patia Haverty

— year-end
191 matches · 81W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patia Haverty to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
W
2026-07-13 · (Q) BSF:Ad Court:Abreu · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Abreu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · (Q) BSF:Ad Court:Abreu · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Abreu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-15 · (Q) BSF:Ad Court:Abreu · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Fausey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · (Q) BSF:Ad Court:Abreu · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Horovitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · BSF:Double Shots:Abreu/Pietrantonio · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · FV:SmashingFlashers:Hogan/Abreu · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Oles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-28 · BSF:Terminetters:Abreu · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Neville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · BSF:Deuces Wild:Polhamus/Turekian · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cliff Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · BSF:Polhamus/Neville · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sam Strong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-14 · BSF:Terminetters:Abreu · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Coccomo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-12 · BSF:Acing Gracefully:Haverty · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Haverty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · BSF:Polhamus/Neville · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Stapleton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Teams54 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
57.7%
41W–30L · 53% of games
4.0
23.3%
14W–46L · 39.5% of games
7.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 54.1% of games
8.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.9% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
12W–16L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
54 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer