← Search

Patrick Barranger

— year-end
28 matches · 16W–12L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Patrick Barranger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-06-07 · Chestnut Oaks Mercurio/Lemco · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-03 · KRA Anders 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Walter Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-02 · KRA Anders 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
David King / Julius Anongos
2026-05-19 · KRA Anders 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Shirey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-12 · KRA Anders 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elliott Gravitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Ace Holes - Walek KRA · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Gushman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · Chestnut Oaks Mercurio/Lemco · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sam Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-25 · Chestnut Oaks Mercurio/Lemco · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-21 · KRA Anders 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Ware
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-12 · Ace Holes - Walek KRA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with CLIFFORD BRIDGE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-11 · Chestnut Oaks Mercurio/Lemco · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-07 · KRA Anders 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Ware
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.7% of games
3.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 51.3% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#2 Singles
11%
3 matches
#3 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova