← Search

Amy Nielsen

Charlotte, NC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 96W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Nielsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
L
2026-04-24 · EFarnham/ERandall (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Esther Farnham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · LPeterson (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-10 · EFarnham/ERandall (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sherri Ehrenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-23 · LPeterson (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Augustine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-21 · LPeterson (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Susan Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-13 · EFarnham/ERandall (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-04-25 · ASmith/AConger (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katharine Cheek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-03-15 · LPeterson (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carolyn Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-06 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christi Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2024-09-30 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Arlene Conger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-08-23 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Arlene Conger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
Sara Youngner / Megan White
2024-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Duckworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
88.5%
46W–6L · 66% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
54.1%
20W–17L · 56.3% of games
9.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.9% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
43 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer