← Search

Kimberly Brumfield

— year-end
139 matches · 83W–56L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Brumfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-07-19 · Over the hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Larry Brumfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · Over the hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Gilmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · Bayside Ballers 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · Bayside Ballers 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-07 · Over the hill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Larry Brumfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-28 · Bayside Ballers 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · Bayside Ballers 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · Bayside Ballers 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-10 · Over the hill · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Larry Brumfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-26 · Bayside Ballers 3.5 winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-03-24 · Bayside Ballers 3.5 winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-12 · Bayside Ballers 3.5 winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
64.6%
51W–28L · 53.6% of games
4.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 43.4% of games
8.0mixed
58.1%
25W–18L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#1 Singles
17%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams