← Search

Edward Shimer

Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 6W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Edward Shimer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-06-11 · LCTA65/Fellabom/I'On · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris South
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · LCTA65/Fellabom/I'On · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Groh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-23 · LCTA65/Fellabom/I'On · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris South
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Shimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tripp Fellabom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Shimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Shimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-3
L
2025-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Shimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Creger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2024-09-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Creger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 44.4% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova