← Search

Christine Kessel

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 3W–24L · seasons 2021–2025

Captains: add Christine Kessel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
L
2025-07-30 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Haseltine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-28 · ASolak (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-23 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sydney Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-16 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Haseltine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-07-14 · ASolak (Jeff Adams) · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-07 · ASolak (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-06 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sydney Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-06-30 · ASolak (Jeff Adams) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-24 · ASolak (Jeff Adams) · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-23 · ASolak (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-06-18 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-28 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Haseltine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–6L · 41.1% of games
4.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 32.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 30% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#1 Singles
15%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#2 Singles
11%
3 matches
#3 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer