← Search

Daniel Baur

Longmont, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 81W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Daniel Baur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
L
2026-07-14 · LTA-P BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Pollack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · LTA-P BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Don Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · LTA-P BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Creek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · LTA-P BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Creek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-16 · LTA-P BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Gluvna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Nicholas Gluvna championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-11 · LTA-Q YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · LTA-P BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wayne Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · LTA-Q YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Creek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · LTA-P BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wayne Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-26 · LTA-Q GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wayne Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · LTA-Q GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Fong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
58.8%
20W–14L · 53.4% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 55% of games
7.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
12W–0L · 62.6% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
38 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer