← Search

Catherine Rama

Charleston, SC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 11W–9L · seasons 2023–2024

Captains: add Catherine Rama to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
L
2024-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrienne Eischeid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-02-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Apple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Judy Hartzog / Susan Davis
2023-10-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Apple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-10-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Silveston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2023-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Apple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2023-09-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Silveston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Roberta Donaldson / Jan Smith
2023-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Speidel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2023-04-03 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Rebecca Martin / Mandy Coleman
2023-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Wisner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Susan Davis / Judy Hartzog
2023-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Silveston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2023-03-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Inabinett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.3% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#1 Singles
10%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer