← Search

Kenneth Rabalais

— year-end
38 matches · 16W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Kenneth Rabalais to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Costello/40/DII/TM/MCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · Costello/40/DII/TM/MCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Edward Halpern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · Costello/40/DII/TM/MCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Will Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-04 · Costello/40/DII/TM/MCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason W Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-01 · Smith/18/3.0/NO/MCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Resor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-09 · Smith/18/3.0/NO/MCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason W Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-09 · Smith/18/3.0/NO/MCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason W Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-02 · Smith/18/3.0/NO/MCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexander Rabalais
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-21 · Smith/18/3.0/NO/MCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bart Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-08-12 · Costello/40/DII/TM/MCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Rivas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-12 · Costello/40/DII/TM/MCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Edward Halpern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-22 · Costello/40/DII/TM/MCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric O'Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 47.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams