← Search

Richard Hicks

— year-end
15 matches · 10W–5L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Richard Hicks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
W
2026-04-13 · MATA/Larry Read · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-06 · MATA/Larry Read · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-04-21 · MATA/Larry Read · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-04-08 · MATA/Larry Read · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-03-27 · MATA/Larry Read · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-03-24 · MATA/Larry Read · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Read
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2024-10-07 · MATA-IHCC Bruce Jones · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Duke Groover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 6-3
L
2024-09-30 · MATA-IHCC Bruce Jones · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-18 · MATA/Bruce Jones · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Duke Groover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2024-02-25 · MATA/Bruce Jones · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carl Garofalo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 6-2
L
2024-02-05 · MATA/Bruce Jones · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Read
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-11-06 · IHCC-JONES · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Driver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams