← Search

Charlie Politi

Lexington, KY
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 49W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Charlie Politi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-08-17 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Benny Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-20 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Schrass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Beth Waterman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · KY/LEX/Owens/Ross · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Schrass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
Greg Hawk / Stephen Johnson
2026-05-31 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Bantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-26 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benny Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-20 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zach Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Bantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · KY/LEX/BANTZ-ROSS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Bantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-08 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Bantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-21 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joey Mckinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2025-08-17 · KY/LEX/BANTZ · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joe Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
73%
27W–10L · 58.8% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 39.1% of games
7.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 59.7% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe