← Search

Maryjane Woody

— year-end
35 matches · 21W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maryjane Woody to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2026-06-22 · Fair Oaks (Nadine Felton)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalia Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2
W
2025-12-13 · Fair Oaks (Nadine Felton)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalia Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-12-06 · Fair Oaks (Nadine Felton)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Ngo-Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-6
L
2025-11-15 · Fair Oaks (Nadine Felton)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naranja Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-22 · Fair Oaks (Darlene Squire)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naranja Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 6-7
W
2025-06-01 · Fair Oaks (Darlene Squire)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Swertfager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-01-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2022-12-10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-6
W
2022-11-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-11-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carole Pavik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 6-3
W
2021-07-13 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Merendino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Dawn Steinmetz / Deidre Norton
2021-07-12 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Leggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams5 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 50% of games
4.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova