← Search

Dana Williams

Marietta, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 25W–16L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Dana Williams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Feazell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
Heather Greenhaw / Jennifer Mason
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-0
W
Molly Sanford / Weesie Floss
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Feazell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-13 · Princeton Mill (Jessica Rice)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Hazelrigs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
Rebecca Piontek / Laura Johnson
2025-11-06 · Princeton Mill (Jessica Rice)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Feazell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-06-26 · Princeton Mill (Jessica Rice)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Yuen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-06-19 · Princeton Mill (Jessica Rice)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Hazelrigs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Jennifer Laborde / Amber Moore
2025-06-11 · Princeton Mill (Jessica Rice)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susie Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-05 · Princeton Mill (Jessica Rice)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Hazelrigs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
61%
25W–16L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 73% of the time
#1 Doubles
73%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova