← Search

Katherine Arthaud

— year-end
54 matches · 28W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katherine Arthaud to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-05-08 · ESB:Simply Smashing:Cook/Melen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia Sherburne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-11 · ESB:Simply Smashing:Cook/Melen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-24 · EE:Intangibles:Fonseca/Cawley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Sherburne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-11-15 · ESB:Smashing Sisters:Small · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-3
L
2025-10-25 · ESB:Smashing Sisters:Small · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-18 · ESB:Smashing Sisters:Small · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-06-22 · ESB:Thomas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-06-21 · ESB:Not My Fault:Strausser/Cook · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jude Melen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-06-15 · ESB:Thomas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allyson Bolduc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-31 · ESB:Not My Fault:Strausser/Cook · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caroline Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-30 · EE:Intangibles:Fonseca/Richardson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Fonseca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-02-23 · EE:Intangibles:Fonseca/Richardson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Sherburne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 47.7% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games
8.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams