← Search

Angie Anvar

Prospect, KY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 28W–46L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Angie Anvar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
L
Pam Williams / Tange Skaggs
2026-07-01 · A55 8.0W Team #2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Riggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Nancy MacMillan / Pam Williams
2026-05-23 · KY/LOU/ANDREWS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Corso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · KY/LOU/ANDREWS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Bonn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-09 · KY/LOU/ANDREWS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-26 · KY/LOU/VOGT/KINSLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Casper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Lisa Allen
2026-04-17 · KY/LOU/ANDREWS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · KY/LOU/ANDREWS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-11 · KY/LOU/VOGT/KINSLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · KY/LOU/VOGT/KINSLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Spears
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-28 · KY/LOU/ANDREWS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Tancula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-22 · KY/LOU/ANDREWS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christie Wafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · KY/LOU/VOGT/KINSLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.6% of games
4.0
37.5%
18W–30L · 44.6% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova