← Search

Rhonda Wiggins

— year-end
49 matches · 23W–26L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Rhonda Wiggins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-05-26 · Mooney Mission · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Horton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-07 · Mission Valley Shot Makers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fiona Dias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-30 · Mission Valley Shot Makers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Ingrando
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · Mooney Mission · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorraine K McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · Mooney Mission · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Hurman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-16 · Mission Valley Shot Makers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fiona Dias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-16 · Mission Valley Jaws · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Sincoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-16 · Mission Valley Jaws · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Sincoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-06-03 · Mooney Mission · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Hibbeln
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-22 · Mission Valley Quigley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Cavness
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-08 · Mission Valley Quigley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Moriarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-06 · Mooney Mission · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.6% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 35% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 56.1% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.6% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer