← Search

Patrick Burnett

— year-end
137 matches · 47W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patrick Burnett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-09-13 · KY/LOU/MCGRAIL · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Greg Oerther
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Jeffrey Anderson / Kevin Merritt
2026-08-23 · A55 9.0M Burnett · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robin Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Jeffrey Anderson / Kevin Merritt
2026-08-23 · A55 9.0M Burnett · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robin Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · KY/LOU/CALDWELL/MCCOY (40's) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Krzysztof Wolek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-21 · KY/LOU/BURNETT · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Nathan Smith / David Holmes
2026-08-15 · KY/LOU/MCGRAIL · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bobby Whitmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Meg Shonkwiler / John Cox
2026-08-08 · KY/LOU/KLINE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammie Taylor-Faber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · KY/LOU/KLINE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammie Taylor-Faber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · KY/LOU/MCGRAIL · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jason Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-24 · KY/LOU/KLINE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammie Taylor-Faber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-19 · KY/LOU/KLINE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammie Taylor-Faber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-18 · A55 9.0M Burnett · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with William Hofmeister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
44.2%
19W–24L · 50.4% of games
4.5
22.4%
11W–38L · 36.3% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 47.8% of games
8.5
0%
0W–5L · 32.2% of games
9.0
0%
0W–5L · 29.4% of games
4.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 46.6% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
9 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams