← Search

Claudia Prager

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 31W–41L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Claudia Prager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-09-08 · LHuntington (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joanne Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · MMetzl (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Hoover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · LHuntington (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brooke Leonnig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · LHuntington (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brooke Leonnig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · MMetzl (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jane Bee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · LHuntington (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-01 · MMetzl (Sardis) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-23 · LHuntington (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · LHuntington (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Bright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-11 · MMetzl (Sardis) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-09 · LHuntington (Queens) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-24 · LHuntington (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Case
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.7% of games
3.5
22.2%
6W–21L · 37.7% of games
6.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 53.2% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#1 Singles
11%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova