← Search

Jeffery Amplement

Amherst, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 29W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffery Amplement to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-07-15 · Serves You Right · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Majerski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · Serves You Right · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Majerski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Serves You Right · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Prise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Majerski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with HUYNHANH LE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-27 · Double shots · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yang Xiao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-01 · Double shots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yang Xiao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Picerno mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · Double Shots · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Picerno mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-02-06 · Maple United Mixed · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Hechinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-01 · Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Picerno mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-23 · Maple United Mixed · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katalin Mechtler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
40%
18W–27L · 47.2% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 27.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe