← Search

Cindy Benedict

Columbus, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
316 matches · 159W–157L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cindy Benedict to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history316 matches
W
2026-05-03 · Wickertree · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Sinclair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Glanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pat Rothney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
L
2026-04-12 · Wickertree · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pat Rothney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Wickertree · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-27 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Sugar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-25 · Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Willging
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-22 · Wickertree · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Timmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
Michelle Wright / Alison Russell
2026-03-20 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Glanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-03-15 · Wickertree · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Sinclair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-08 · Wickertree · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Sugar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-06 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Sugar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 57.1% of games
4.0
49.4%
129W–132L · 47.6% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.8% of games
7.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 48.1% of games
8.0
50%
7W–7L · 46.1% of games
8.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
124 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
81 matches
#1 Singles
3%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova