← Search

Patricia Martel-Buxton

— year-end
182 matches · 96W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patricia Martel-Buxton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
W
2026-08-17 · WOOD:NoOne'sFault:Alcock · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Alcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · WOOD:NoOne'sFault:Alcock · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Alcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Susan Thompson / Felicia Mathias
2026-07-18 · WOOD:NoOne'sFault:Alcock · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Alcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Apex:LoveHold:Buxton · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Brewster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Apex:LoveHold:Buxton · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Brewster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · Apex:LoveHold:Buxton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Brewster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · Apex:LoveHold:Buxton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Brewster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · Apex:LoveHold:Buxton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Brewster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-23 · Apex:LoveHold:Buxton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Brewster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · Apex:LoveHold:Buxton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Brewster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-02 · Apex:GameChangers:Crosby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Otis-Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · Apex:GameChangers:Crosby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Lindsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
67.1%
47W–23L · 54.4% of games
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.9% of games
6.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 61.4% of games
7.0
35%
7W–13L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
15W–21L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
44 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer