← Search

Patty Jackson

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 93W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patty Jackson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history177 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Merritt Swartley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Tina Measham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Marnie Newton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Heidi Hawkins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-22 · Each Hit 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Measham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-19 · Each Hit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marnie Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-18 · Each Hit · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · Each Hit 55+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Measham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Each Hit · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Each Hit · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · Each Hit · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Boren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · Each Hit 55+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Sukow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
68.6%
35W–16L · 58.1% of games
4.0
40%
28W–42L · 46.9% of games
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 58.8% of games
8.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 41.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 69% of games
7.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 45% of the time
#1 Singles
45%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#2 Singles
14%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova