← Search

Jadee Kirkham

Kennewick, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 42W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jadee Kirkham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-07-25 · PC-Happy Hour · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Kirkham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-2
W
2026-07-24 · PC-Happy Hour · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Kirkham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · PC-Girls with Incredible Luck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Smoot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-30 · PC-Girls with Incredible Luck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Jorgensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-30 · PC-Girls with Incredible Luck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Smoot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · PC-Girls with Incredible Luck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Jorgensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-22 · PC-Swing Away · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-03-21 · PC-Swing Away · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Jorgensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · PC-Swing Away · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma Stucki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-20 · PC-Swing Away · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Smoot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Victoria Smoot championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-22 · #2 Doubles · with Victoria Smoot championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
46.2%
24W–28L · 49.7% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.8%
11W–12L · 48.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer