← Search

LuAnne Pate

— year-end
129 matches · 45W–84L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add LuAnne Pate to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
2026-09-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 + · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mollie Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · with Cindy Japec championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · LHMA-MacFadyen/Jetton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Toivonen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-13 · LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 4.0 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Hartsell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-07 · LHMA-MacFadyen/Jetton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Japec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-05 · LCJA-Japec /CSD Spartan Park · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Kitchens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · LHMA-MacFadyen/Jetton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Cloninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-16 · LHMA-MacFadyen/Jetton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Cloninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-14 · LCJA-Japec /CSD Spartan Park · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Kitchens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-07 · LCJA-Japec /CSD Spartan Park · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Kitchens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-02 · LHMA-MacFadyen/Jetton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Cloninger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.9% of games
4.0
35.3%
24W–44L · 43.5% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
25%
4W–12L · 37.5% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 43.8% of games
4.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 37.3% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe