← Search

Julie Stivers

— year-end
64 matches · 41W–23L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Julie Stivers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-08-25 · RCC Samuels/Stivers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Terrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · RCC Samuels/Greiner · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah O'Neill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-1
W
2026-08-18 · RCC Samuels/Stivers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Kauder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Carisa Dueweke / Brenda Clark
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Denise Terrell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Denise Terrell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Denise Terrell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · RCC Samuels/Stivers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Terrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · RCC Samuels/Stivers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophia Schaffernoth - (DQ)*
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · RCC Samuels/Stivers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irina Schaffernoth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · RCC Samuels/Stivers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geri Samuels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Belmont -Colgin · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Taft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · Belmont -Colgin · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Taft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
76.3%
29W–9L · 57.6% of games
4.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.5% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.5% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert