← Search

Andrea Katz

Fort Lauderdale, FL
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
42 matches · 18W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrea Katz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-08-21 · Jetc/Peters · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Randi Greenfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · Jetc/Peters · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Cashman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-29 · Jetc/Peters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiki Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · Jetc/Peters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Cashman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-13 · Jetc/Peters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiki Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-06 · Jetc/Peters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Haeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-23 · Jetc/Peters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Stuto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-01-09 · Jetc/Peters · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Culp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-01-24 · Jetc/Rogerson · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Rogerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Betsy Silver
2023-07-10 · A40 3.5W MV3 Lenahan · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Gena Cohen / Erin Oakley
2023-05-22 · A40 3.5W MV3 Lenahan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Stonehill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-05-08 · A40 3.5W MV3 Lenahan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Stonehill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 49.2% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 34.2% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.8% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#1 Singles
14%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe