← Search

Anna Hitchins

Charlotte, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 96W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anna Hitchins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
L
2026-05-06 · BTennyson (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dora Burdzinska-Drezek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-3
W
N/A
2026-04-01 · BTennyson (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diofra Azucenas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-10-01 · RSchuler (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nadine Neel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-23 · CKahm/EMoss (Barclay Downs) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lane Merlo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-09 · CKahm/EMoss (Barclay Downs) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Beth Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-09-05 · #3 Doubles · with Bharath Bhaskar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-03 · RSchuler (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Claudia Vizzini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2025-09-02 · CKahm/EMoss (Barclay Downs) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Beth Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-08-18 · CKahm/EMoss (Barclay Downs) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Darri Thayaprasat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-13 · RSchuler (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Sopel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-08-05 · CKahm/EMoss (Barclay Downs) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Beth Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-29 · WParker/BBhaskar (Mason Wallace) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bharath Bhaskar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
77.8%
28W–8L · 63% of games
4.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 53.4% of games
7.5
100%
9W–0L · 66.3% of games
8.5
77.4%
24W–7L · 57.2% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 46.7% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 25% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
42 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova