← Search

Rudy Seelmann

— year-end
143 matches · 96W–47L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Rudy Seelmann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
Justin Fox / Nick Kitchel
2026-09-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-03 · Duncan - RS Hard · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-02 · Duncan - RS Hard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Duncan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-29 · Richardson - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sam Richardson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-2
W
2026-05-28 · Duncan - RS Hard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Duncan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Duncan - RS Hard · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ethan Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-22 · Sitton - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Bonjorno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-15 · Sitton - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jerry Mosley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-08 · Sitton - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Struck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · Escambia/Worley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Struck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-01 · Sitton - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brad Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · Escambia/Worley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
77.6%
45W–13L · 60.4% of games
4.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 40% of games
7.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.4% of games
8.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 62.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
29 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer